-
Andrés Gómez Emilsson is the director of the Qualia Research Institute (QRI) and a researcher focused on mathematically modeling consciousness, valence (the felt goodness or badness of experience), and the “state space” of qualia (all possible subjective sensations). He argues that consciousness is the deepest unsolved problem in science and that a complete theory must satisfy four hard constraints: (1) explain why consciousness exists, (2) map the full palette of qualia and their interrelationships, (3) explain the causal/evolutionary function of consciousness, and (4) solve the binding problem (how disparate information is unified into a single moment of experience). He treats the “hard problem” of consciousness as largely an artifact of materialist ontology; if consciousness is taken as fundamental, the hard problem dissolves and the real work becomes understanding boundaries, causality, and valence.
-
Emilsson’s intellectual path began with a childhood obsession with “why there is something rather than nothing,” initially pursued through physics. At 16 he had an ego-death / mystical experience that shattered his default assumption of being a fixed self and convinced him that consciousness, not physics, was the deepest mystery. He later encountered David Pearce’s “Hedonic Imperative” website, which argued that suffering is not necessary for intelligence and that we could in principle engineer beings to be chronically happy (e.g., people with hyperthymia). This led to two major updates: (1) philosophy alone cannot solve suffering—technology is needed, and (2) consciousness is not just information processing; the binding problem means substrate matters, so a digital brain simulation might be unconscious. These insights, plus frustration that academia studied cognition rather than qualia, led him to found QRI in 2018.
-
The Qualia Research Institute is organized as a 3×3 matrix: three goals (prevent intense suffering, improve baseline well-being, and map / access extreme positive states like the Buddhist jhanas) pursued through three disciplines (philosophy of mind, neuroscience, and neurotechnology). QRI’s distinctive bet is that a universal theory of consciousness must generalize to “extreme” states—e.g., it should predict what happens if you combine ketamine + DMT—just as physics must generalize to extreme temperatures. They use psychedelics as research tools, run retreats bringing together physicists, mathematicians, and meditators, and develop non-invasive neurotech to give people more control over their own valence.
-
Emilsson distinguishes valence (how good or bad an experience feels) from the “intentional object” (what the experience is about). Evolution has tightly coupled valence with aboutness, which is why meaningless pleasures feel hollow and why Viktor Frankl’s “meaning” is ultimately a valence phenomenon: people who say their life is deeply meaningful but unpleasant can, on micro-phenomenological interview, point to positive-valence body sensations. He argues valence is not reducible to reinforcement learning; the QRI-endorsed “symmetry theory of valence” (from co-founder Mike Johnson) proposes that positive valence corresponds to symmetry/harmony in the mathematical structure of experience, and negative valence to asymmetry/dissonance—analogous to consonance and dissonance in music.
-
On the binding problem and self: Emilsson describes meditation practices that function as “impedance matching”—by evenly attending to two body regions at once, their vibrations synchronize; recursively doing this across the body can bring the whole sensorium into coherence, which is experienced as the first jhana (a powerful whole-body vibration state). He interprets this as evidence that boundaries in consciousness are implemented by out-of-phase interactions; when everything synchronizes, boundaries dissolve and the sense of self drops. He distinguishes the sense of self (a qualia-like feature that can be present or absent) from the bare fact of being a subject of experience. Advanced meditators (e.g., Roger Thiesdal, Brian Scott, Daniel Ingram) describe a progression from (1) a coagulated bodily self, to (2) the witness, to (3) everything-is-self (God-mind), to (4) nothing-is-self, to (5) no-self-and-no-center—a state that is valence-enhancing because it drops the effort of maintaining a self-model.
-
Emilsson’s ontology is a form of monistic idealism: the universe is a single field of consciousness, and individual minds are topological “pockets” in that field—analogous to twisting a balloon until it pinches into two bubbles connected by a point. This is QRI’s “topological solution to the boundary problem.” He endorses David Pearce’s “zero ontology”: deep reality is a zero that entails everything, and in physics (total charge/energy ≈ 0), math (building from the empty set), and consciousness (qualia values canceling out on 5-MeO-DMT), the values cancel. Crucially, he argues valence does not cancel: valence is an emergent structural property (like harmony in music), so it is possible in principle for reality to be net-positive even though low-level features sum to zero.
-
On psychedelics vs. meditation: Emilsson sees psychedelics and meditation as broadly synergistic but with different risk profiles. Classic psychedelics (LSD, psilocybin, DMT) tend to be “constructive”—they richly elaborate world-models and can overfit, generating delusional beliefs (e.g., “the Russians have a base on the dark side of the moon”). 5-MeO-DMT is “deconstructive”—it tends to cancel topological defects and simplify experience toward oneness, but can underfit (e.g., “love is all that matters”). He suspects 5-MeO-DMT, used once a year in the right setting, could accelerate a 20-year awakening process down to ~7 years, but he explicitly does not recommend it widely because of the risk of severe bad trips and dark nights of the soul. He notes that DMT and 5-MeO-DMT have opposite effects on the self: DMT fragments it into many competing “entities” (multiple vortices), while 5-MeO-DMT collapses everything into one coherent field.
-
QRI’s current research models the brain as a network of coupled oscillators (local field potentials, ~10,000-neuron populations) whose interactions create vortices in the electromagnetic field; these vortices correspond to moments of experience and to the sense of self. On DMT, the system enters a phase of many competing clusters of coherence (hence entities and complexity); on 5-MeO-DMT, it enters a globally coherent phase (hence oneness and boundary dissolution). They are building simulation tools that replicate psychedelic phenomenology by tuning oscillator parameters, aiming to eventually make rigorous, falsifiable predictions about any state of consciousness.
-
Emilsson’s most consoling finding is how accessible jhana states can be with the right technique—specifically Rob Beaubrun’s “ember-growing” method, which uses intelligence, creativity, and intuition to grow small pockets of bodily pleasure into whole-body ecstatic coherence. He estimates roughly ~600 hours of practice can get someone into the jhanas, which he frames as a world-transforming fact: extreme well-being is far more available than most people think, and no one who reaches the jhanas regrets the effort.