- Anne Applebaum is a Pulitzer Prize-winning historian and journalist who has spent decades studying how democracies collapse and authoritarian systems rise, first through her work on the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, and more recently by observing the same patterns re-emerging in the United States and other Western democracies.
- She began as a student in Leningrad and later watched the Soviet Union fall apart while working as a journalist in Warsaw.
- She wrote major history books about Soviet control over Eastern Europe, the Gulag, and the Ukrainian famine, believing she was documenting a distant past, until around 2014–2015 when she realized the same authoritarian instincts were resurfacing in modern democracies.
- Her goal is to remind people why democracy matters and to draw attention to the ways it is declining so that citizens can fight back.
How Modern Democracies Actually End
- Most people imagine democracies end with coups, tanks in the street, or someone storming a presidential palace, but in the modern world they mostly end when someone who is legitimately elected begins to take apart the system from within.
- The pioneer of this model was Viktor Orbán in Hungary, who was elected with a large majority and then slowly captured the state by dismantling neutral institutions.
- What a democracy needs to survive: independent courts, an independent electoral commission, independent media, and a meritocratic bureaucracy where people are hired for expertise rather than political loyalty.
- When elected leaders decide to take those institutions apart, elections become unfair, public trust breaks down, and the national conversation shifts in dangerous ways.
Why This Time Feels Different
- What feels different now is that for the first time in several established democracies, most notably the United States, political parties are coming to power with the explicit intention of altering the system to ensure they can stay in power permanently.
- The United States is the largest democracy and has played the role of leader of the democratic world, so its decline has profound influence on other countries.
- The idea that democracies can break down is both horrifying people and emboldening others who think: if it can happen in America, it can happen here.
- Applebaum pushes back against the assumption that America is immune, pointing to the pre-civil-rights-era South, where one-party states with rigged rules and restricted voting existed for decades.
The United States Is Already Being Reclassified
- A democracy index map shown in the conversation no longer classifies the United States as a liberal democracy, instead labeling it an “electoral democracy,” a category that implies elections happen but the system is less free.
- Liberal democracies still exist in much of Europe, Australia, Japan, and South Korea, but the global trend over the past one to two decades has been one of democratic decline.
- States influence one another, and the American example is accelerating that decline.
- Applebaum says the US could become what the map calls an “autocratic gray zone,” effectively a one-party state where one political party has structural control and the other cannot win national elections.
Five Core Tactics Autocrats Use to Dismantle Democracy
- Applebaum identifies five tactics that autocratic leaders use to take apart democracies from within, and she links each to current developments in the West.
1. Corruption
- Corruption exists in any political system, but in an autocracy the legal system is controlled, so there are no real consequences for those in power.
- In the United States, the Department of Justice has been taken over by loyalists who are being used to prosecute the president’s political enemies rather than investigate high-level corruption.
- Trump’s net worth reportedly grew from $2.3 billion to $6.5 billion during his time in office, a scale of presidential profiteering without precedent in American history.
- The Trump family does business in countries like Saudi Arabia, where the Saudi government invested $2 billion in Jared Kushner’s fund and Kushner now serves as the administration’s Middle East negotiator, creating an overwhelming appearance of conflict of interest.
- Tech CEOs who once criticized Trump have gone silent or become supportive, understanding that access to government contracts and favorable regulation depends on staying in the president’s good graces.
- Applebaum argues this is shortsighted: if the American political and legal system declines, these business leaders will ultimately suffer too, as happened to oligarchs in Russia when the rules changed.
2. Attacking Elections
- When the rules of elections are challenged, who can vote is restricted, or results are questioned without evidence, democracy is in trouble.
- Gerrymandering in the US involves redrawing electoral districts to favor one party, as in Nashville, which was divided into multiple constituencies designed so only Republicans win.
- There are concerns that ICE paramilitary agents could be deployed on election day to intimidate voters.
- Voter ID proposals that require passports or birth certificates would disproportionately affect young voters (24% of 18-to-29-year-olds lack qualifying documents), minority citizens, low-income Americans (only one in five households earning under $50,000 has a passport), and married women (69 million of whom have birth certificates that do not match their current legal name).
- The administration promotes the conspiracy theory that illegal immigrants are voting in large numbers, which serves as a pretext to disqualify Democratic votes and call for recounts.
3. Capturing the Civil Service (Personnel)
- Modern democracies require expert bureaucrats who measure pollution, regulate insurance markets, and manage infrastructure based on competence, not political loyalty.
- In corrupt autocracies, these jobs go to the president’s cousins or the vice president’s best friends.
- Trump has tried to undermine the independence of the Federal Reserve by pressuring Jerome Powell to resign or change policy, and has sought to install loyalists in historically independent institutions like the Department of Justice.
- The danger is that civil servants stop acting in the interests of all Americans and start serving the president, his family, and his party.
4. Controlling Information
- All dictatorships seek to control information, though the methods have evolved from crossing out sentences in newspapers to controlling media ownership and shaping the digital information space.
- China has built an entirely controlled internet connected to surveillance systems; Russia has cut off access to most Western social media.
- In the US, federal regulators are willing to put pressure on television stations if the president asks, and the president influences who acquires media companies to ensure new owners are friendly to him.
- Trump has targeted TikTok, CBS, and CNN, seeking sympathetic leadership at each.
- The administration also pressures universities, as when it tried to dictate who would teach what courses at Harvard, and took over the Kennedy Center arts venue.
- Applebaum notes that both the left and the right have illiberal instincts around speech, but true free speech advocates, who are willing to call out censorship on both sides, are vanishingly few.
- The conversation also addresses Section 230, which exempts social media platforms from the legal responsibilities that newspapers have, and Applebaum argues that platforms should be held to the same legal standards as offline media, particularly around election spending, child safety, and terrorist recruitment.
5. Controlling the Power Ministries and the Use of Violence
- Most autocracies eventually create a repressive physical system, not just an informational one, to coerce people who do not go along.
- ICE in the United States was designed as an immigration enforcement agency but has been transformed into a masked, militarized force wearing combat uniforms, driving unmarked cars, and operating without accountability to local authorities.
- During protests in Minnesota, two US citizens were killed by ICE, and the administration’s immediate response was to declare the victims guilty rather than to investigate, granting the force impunity.
- When a police force can harm ordinary citizens without consequence and is accountable only to the ruling party, it functions as a paramilitary.
The Global Ripple Effects of American Decline
- Countries around the world are already hedging against American unreliability, forming new trade and security relationships that would have been unthinkable a few years ago.
- The EU and India have signed a trade agreement; Canada is initiating a security relationship with the EU; NATO members are privately planning for a scenario in which the US does not help in case of a Russian attack.
- Middle powers like Brazil, India, Japan, and EU countries are building new relationships with each other as alternatives to dependence on the United States.
- The breaking point for many Europeans was when Trump suggested invading Greenland, a Danish territory, forcing Denmark and its allies to seriously plan for a military confrontation with their closest ally.
- Canada, which was almost fully integrated with the US economy, is now exploring deals with China and India and considering how to leverage its oil and gas wealth for sovereignty.
- For Americans, this hedging is very bad news because postwar American prosperity and security dominance have been built on deep relationships with Europe and global trade, including the ability to project power from NATO bases.
Why Autocracy Appeals to People
- Applebaum acknowledges that authoritarianism offers something real to some people: a sense of stability, security, hierarchy, and traditional values.
- The argument made by Russian and Chinese propaganda inside Western countries is exactly this: authoritarianism means stability, safety, and order, while democracy means constant change, cacophony, and demands on citizens.
- In Russia, people have no way to express dissent safely, so they adjust their behavior and stay out of politics altogether, a phenomenon Applebaum observed in the Soviet Union where it became convenient to at least say you believed the propaganda.
- Happiness surveys consistently rank Scandinavian democracies as the happiest places in the world, connected to democracy, stability, wealth, and the ability to influence government decisions.
- Applebaum believes informed people would choose democracy if given the choice, but authoritarians who control information and monopolize violence can be very hard to undo even when a majority wants something different.
The Iran War and the Danger of Unaccountable Decision-Making
- Applebaum identifies a feature of dictatorships that is often overlooked: nobody questions the leader’s decisions or offers alternatives.
- Trump was warned that Iran was not like Venezuela, that the regime was deeply embedded, that Iran had plans for decentralized leadership succession, and that it controlled proxy groups and potentially the Strait of Hormuz, but nobody told him definitively that the war was a bad idea because contradicting him risks being dismissed.
- Trump never communicated with the Iranian democratic opposition or alternative leadership because his interest was never democracy but rather dominating Iran and securing oil revenues.
- His approval ratings have dropped to all-time lows, and even former supporters like Tucker Carlson have begun apologizing, but Trump’s response is to repeat that the war is going well and that “we’ve won,” a pattern that makes it impossible to assess reality.
- Applebaum says Trump has no strategy, only a narcissistic need to be seen as winning in every moment, which is incompatible with long-term strategic thinking.
Whether Democracy or Autocracy Lasts Longer
- Autocracies last longer than democracies throughout history, because most human societies have been governed by monarchs, tribal leaders, or warlords, and very few liberal democracies have endured.
- The American founders knew this, reading the histories of the Roman Republic and Athenian democracy, both of which fell, and trying to build checks and balances to prevent the same fate.
- Applebaum rejects historical inevitability, arguing that what happens depends on the choices people make today, not on some predetermined cycle.
- She cites Poland as an example of a country that has completely transformed itself in ways that were not predictable in 1990, and Russia as a country that could have taken a completely different path if someone other than Putin had been chosen as Yeltsin’s successor.
- She acknowledges that human nature is a constant and that there are always some people who are instinctively authoritarian and others instinctively liberal, but the balance depends on leadership, institutions, and which values are encouraged or discouraged.
The Relationship Between Democracy and Capitalism
- Contrary to the assumption that democracies produce rampant inequality, Applebaum argues that the most successful democracies of the postwar era were relatively equal, with large welfare states and significant redistribution of wealth.
- The happiest countries, Scandinavia, are also among the most equal.
- The United States in the 1950s was a period of enormous social mobility and shared prosperity, which coincided with a flourishing of democracy including the civil rights movement.
- The emergence of tech oligarchs with more power than any politician, who can shape the information space, raises the question of how long that group will want to live in a democracy where wealth is supposed to be distributed more evenly.
- Some members of that community have already become illiberal or anti-democratic for exactly that reason.
What Citizens Can Do
- Applebaum’s central advice is to vote in all elections, including local ones, and to reject the nihilistic idea that all politicians are the same and voting does not matter, because creating that apathy is exactly what autocrats want.
- She urges people to pay attention to how leaders talk about the press, the judiciary, and the civil service, and to support leaders who respect those institutions.
- She emphasizes the importance of independent journalism and truth-seeking as a profession, warning that if AI algorithms continue to personalize information and create separate realities for each person, the shared factual basis necessary for democracy will erode.
- She also warns that the algorithmic incentive to serve people content that makes them dwell, including outrage and conflict, is already deepening polarization, which she calls the most toxic force for democracy.
Why This Is Personal for Applebaum
- Applebaum’s motivation comes from having lived briefly in the Soviet Union as a student and felt what it was like to exist in a heavily autocratic society, and then spending her life trying to understand how such systems work and why people go along with them.
- She was radicalized herself, in a sense, around 2014–2015 when she realized she was living through a historical shift and needed to record it as an eyewitness, which led to her book Twilight of Democracy.
- Being married to Poland’s foreign minister gave her a personal vantage point on political radicalization, as she watched people she knew well become more extreme.
- Her goal is not to elect any particular person but to remind people why democracy is important and to pay attention to the ways it is declining so that they can fight back.