Andy Weir Shares His Best Writing Advice

How I Write • • 1h10 → 6 min • #140
Andy Weir Shares His Best Writing Advice
Watch on YouTube

Summary

  • Andy Weir, author of The Martian and Project Hail Mary, discusses his writing process, the craft of science fiction, and his path from self-published serial to bestselling novelist and film adaptations.

How Andy turns ideas into books

  • Ideas begin as daydreams about interesting science; for Project Hail Mary the kernel was a mass-conversion fuel that could turn matter into light for propulsion.
  • He iterates through implausible setups (mad scientist, alien ship) until the concept becomes a self-replicating life form — a microbe that grows on stars and spores outward using mass conversion.
  • The existential threat emerges: the microbe infects the Sun, forcing a desperate mission to the one unaffected star (Tau Ceti) using the same fuel.
  • Hail Mary is a pastiche of abandoned story ideas glued together: a first-contact story, the mass-conversion fuel, and a character (Stratt) with godlike authority to solve a crisis.

Stakes as propulsion

  • Stakes drive the story; Hail Mary uses extinction-level stakes (billions dead, humanity at risk) with a tiny, desperate crew.
  • Weir prefers lower, personal stakes (The Martian: one life; Artemis: one woman’s well-being) and finds it odd that sci-fi often defaults to planetary stakes when other genres don’t.
  • High stakes made Hail Mary easier because they emerged naturally from the premise, but he intentionally avoids them as a crutch.

From premise to draft

  • He identifies four or five major turning points, then writes toward them, improvising the connective tissue.
  • Example turning points in Hail Mary: waking with amnesia → realizing he’s on a spacecraft → realizing he’s in the Tau Ceti system → flashbacks revealing Astrophage and Stratt → Rocky’s arrival and first contact → communication established.
  • Amnesia is a “cheesy trope” he advises against, but it lets the reader discover the world alongside the protagonist, avoiding exposition dumps.

Why you should avoid flashbacks (and when they work)

  • Flashbacks annoy him when they’re homework: pausing the present for irrelevant backstory (e.g., a nagging wife three weeks earlier).
  • His flashbacks advance the plot and unfold mysteries in real time; each memory is triggered by the current action and raises/answers questions.
  • He used them reluctantly to interweave the Earth-side backstory (Stratt, mission prep) with the present-day ship story, otherwise Rocky wouldn’t appear until halfway through.

How to make readers trust your story

  • Trust comes from not breaking immersion; scientific accuracy builds a “credit” with readers — after a chapter or two they assume the science is right and skip the math.
  • Early exposition (e.g., microwave mesh explaining wavelength interaction) tethers the fiction to reality and teaches something true.
  • He treats “show, don’t tell” with an asterisk: direct exposition saves pages, and first-person conversational narration makes it feel like a person talking to you, not a textbook.
  • Humor is the lubricant: readers forgive any exposition if you make them laugh once a paragraph.

Give your character one fear

  • Weir considers character depth a weakness; he’s plot-driven. Mark Watney was an idealized version of himself; Jazz Bashara was a flawed, younger version — too flawed, making her hard to root for.
  • For Ryland Grace he built a character from whole cloth: core trait = pathological fear of conflict and confrontation (left academia after a paper was challenged, became a middle-school teacher where kids think he’s cool and no one pushes back).
  • Quirks follow from the core: never swears, uses “fudge,” “gosh” — later explained by his teacher persona.
  • The scenario forces him to confront his fear: he’s non-confrontational, doesn’t want to die, said no to the mission, was forced onto it.
  • Real character change comes only at the climax: choosing to save Rocky (and Rocky’s species) over returning to Earth, believing it’s a suicide sacrifice.

How he wrote Rocky

  • Started with zero constraints: alien need not survive Earth conditions. Used real (later retracted) exoplanet data for 40 Eridani: ~8 Earth masses, ~2g surface gravity, 46-day orbit → 200°C surface temp.
  • To keep liquid water at 200°C: ~29 atm pressure. To retain atmosphere against stellar wind: extremely strong magnetic field.
  • Thick atmosphere blocks sunlight → biosphere becomes an atmospheric “ocean” with photosynthetic layers and apex predators on the ground.
  • Designed speculative biology from there: spider-like, rock-eating, ammonia-breathing, sound-based communication.
  • Rocky’s personality: likable “golden retriever” energy, but actually grumpy and insulting in a bickering-couple dynamic (e.g., “wait faster” while epoxy cures). Linguistic quirks (tripling words for emphasis) make him lovable.

You should plant clues for your reader

  • He avoids deus ex machina by seeding future problems early: if something breaks at 80k words, he goes back and plants hints (e.g., “acting up a bit”) so the failure feels earned.
  • Uses spreadsheets extensively: relativistic rocket equations, Astrophage energy absorption/enrichment rates, Eridian biology/caloric needs — all to keep the physics internally consistent.

Why Andy avoids symbolism

  • No ulterior motive, no moral, no symbolism of any kind. Astrophage is not an allegory for climate change or inner turmoil.
  • He writes “straight up here’s a sequence of events,” almost journaling real events. Goal: entertainment.
  • He enjoys taking well-trodden SF territory (stranded on a planet, first contact) and doing it his way: rigorous science, truly alien aliens, no common language, physical barriers between species.

How The Martian became a bestseller

  • Software engineer with three years’ runway wrote The Martian while lonely in Boston; serialized a chapter every 6–8 weeks on a bare-bones HTML site to ~3,000 readers built over 10 years of short fiction.
  • Readers (nerds) fact-checked the math, improving accuracy. Refused donations; suggested cancer research instead.
  • Fans demanded e-reader format → self-published via KDP at $0.99 minimum (Amazon’s floor). Evangelical fan base bought it en masse → algorithmic boost → top-selling SF ebook.
  • Literary agent David Fugate approached → Random House print deal and Fox film option same week. Option = $25k for 18-month exclusive right to buy rights later; studios option everything.
  • Physical proof copy was the “this is real” moment; film became real only after first day of filming (contracts activate).

Do you need a publisher?

  • Prefers traditional publishing: publishers are a marketing/publicity machine no individual can match (distribution to B&N, Waterstones, Target, Walmart; ads in reader publications; NYT review copies; interview coordination).
  • Advice for unknown authors: query agents first; if rejected, e-publish. Build an audience with free short stories/webcomics over time. He’s not a marketing guru.

Two rules for a great plot

  • Causal chain: every event knocks into the next (cascade failure). No coincidences or lightning strikes. The Martian is one long causal sequence.
  • Protagonist outsmarts the reader: the solution makes perfect sense in retrospect, all seeds were there, but the reader didn’t see it. Example: Walter White in Breaking Bad offering Jesse to Gus to save himself — proactive, logical, surprising.

Is sci-fi really a genre?

  • Sci-fi is a setting, not a genre (like “Chicago,” not “action”). You can have SF romance, SF noir, SF drama.
  • Asimov: three laws of robotics as a rule set, then explores edge cases; mixed genres (SF noir in Caves of Steel).
  • Clarke: extreme hard SF, physics never cheated (Rendezvous with Rama: rotating cylinder, centrifugal gravity, aliens indifferent to humans).
  • Heinlein: wild speculation within physics (interplanetary travel, pirates, social structures).
  • Joy of SF = joy of discovery: vicarious high when a character figures out something no one else knows.

Will AI write better than humans?

  • Inevitable that AI will eventually write better stories. Bleak but honest; hard to convince someone when livelihood depends on disbelief.
  • Future: AI reads all books + reviews → generates book predicted to get good reviews → tailored fiction per user (local AI knows your history, writes a book only you love).
  • Tension: shared cultural touchstones (Harry Potter, Hail Mary) vs. hyper-personalized content. Likely both coexist; human writing becomes artisanal (like painted portraits vs. photos).
  • Automation historically creates more jobs (pilots: automation → more planes/flights → more pilots). Writers become AI operators/guides.
  • Current AI has an “AI accent”: wrong detail density, repetition, rudimentary. Not useful for brainstorming yet. Reinforcement learning will close gaps.

Andy’s heroes and recommendations

  • Astronaut John Young: Apollo 16 commander, heart rate never above 70 on launch — stoic, unflappable, spanned Mercury through Shuttle, walked on Moon.
  • Holy trinity of SF: Asimov (setting-not-genre, rule-tweaking), Heinlein (wild speculation), Clarke (hard science, alien indifference).
  • One book to start: Caves of Steel (novel with arc; I, Robot is short-story collection). Series continues if you like it.
Back to How I Write