Building Defense Technologies to Protect Democracies | Torsten Reil, Helsing

David Senra 1h23 4 min #37
Building Defense Technologies to Protect Democracies | Torsten Reil, Helsing
Watch on YouTube

Summary

  • Torsten Reil, co-founder and CEO of Helsing, explains how AI-driven autonomous drones and fighter jets are making traditional tanks, artillery, and crewed aircraft obsolete, and why Europe must build its own mass-producible, software-defined defense industrial base to deter aggression and protect democracies.

The battlefield has already shifted to autonomous drones

  • Tanks and artillery are no longer survivable; Russian front-line soldier life expectancy is roughly 20–30 minutes because ISR drones spot targets and FPV or larger strike drones destroy them within minutes.
  • The kill chain is now: ISR drone detects → strike drone (FPV or long-range autonomous) engages; humans in vehicles or on foot cannot survive this environment.
  • Jamming is defeated either by fiber-optic tether (FPVs) or by onboard AI that navigates visually without GPS and performs terminal guidance autonomously.
  • Once strike drones become fully autonomous (no radio link to jam), the lethality and scale increase further; Helsing’s HX2 strike drone already flies 100 km with 2–4 kg payload using GPS-free visual navigation.
  • Reil argues 100,000 such autonomous strike drones at a border could destroy an invading armored column of 3,000 tanks in hours, making large-scale land invasion effectively impossible — the core of his deterrence thesis.

Helsing was founded to give Europe a sovereign, AI-first defense industrial base

  • Reil (ex-NaturalMotion, sold to Zynga for ~$500M) did not plan another company until meeting co-founders Gundbert Scherf (ex-McKinsey aerospace/defense) and Nicholas Gross (AI for legacy primes) in late 2020/early 2021.
  • All three independently concluded Europe had no Anduril/Palantir equivalent: no venture-backed, software-first defense company capable of mass-producing autonomous systems.
  • Founded March 2021; extremely unpopular — banks treated defense like porn/gambling, VCs refused meetings; raised €8M seed from angels/family offices, then Daniel Ek (Prima Materia) invested €100M three months later, pre-Ukraine invasion.
  • Mission: “protect our democracies.” This clarity replaces generic corporate values; deployed systems in Ukraine make the mission concrete daily.
  • Explicit commitment: never sell the company; build a generational European champion like Spotify.

Winning programs of record — the Eurofighter electronic-warfare upgrade

  • Strategy: use the €100M war chest to bid directly on large government “programs of record” (prime contracts in national budgets) instead of subcontracting — high risk, long cycles, but the only path to scale fast.
  • First target: German Eurofighter electronic-warfare upgrade. Legacy radar-warning receivers failed against software-defined, shape-shifting radars; Helsing’s deep-learning approach won against established consortia in 2 years 4 months — fastest founding-to-program-of-record on record.
  • Nicholas’s AI intuition + Gundbert’s program knowledge + Reil’s fundraising/ops created the repeatable playbook: find large programs where AI gives a differentiated edge, bet big, deliver.

Centaur: a superhuman AI fighter pilot for beyond-visual-range combat

  • Beyond-visual-range (BVR) air combat is “chess in the sky” — radar management, missile kinematics, energy bleeding, offensive/defensive timing.
  • Active pilots called it the last bastion of human intuition; Helsing trained a neural net via reinforcement learning in a simulator running 20,000–25,000× real-time (AlphaGo/AlphaStar approach).
  • Result: AI consistently beats active Eurofighter, Rafale, and Gripen pilots in simulation and, in 2023, flew a Saab Gripen (Centaur) in live air-combat maneuvers over the Baltic Sea against a human-piloted Gripen — won all three engagements.
  • Centaur now scales to swarms of autonomous fighters; Reil concludes crewed fighters will become untenable against autonomous swarms — same logic as tanks: immoral to send humans when machines are superior and survival is near zero.

Deterrence, autonomy, and the morality of defense

  • Ultimate goal: zero lives lost by preventing war through credible deterrence — make the adversary’s cost calculus prohibitively high.
  • If deterrence fails, minimize own casualties by replacing humans with autonomous systems on land, air, and sea; this is not aggression but moral necessity.
  • Society must decide whether machines may make life/death decisions when they are more accurate than humans; Helsing runs internal ethics workshops, deployment guides, and proliferation controls, but public/journalist scrutiny has faded since Ukraine.
  • Reil acknowledges pacifist pushback (especially in Germany) but argues it ignores the reality of adversaries building capabilities; containment via strength is the only stable peace.

Mass manufacturing: simple hardware, complex software, vertical integration where it matters

  • Thesis: design hardware “good enough” for mass production, absorb complexity into AI software (sensor fusion, recalibration, coordination) — enables saturation attacks and rapid scaling.
  • HX2 strike drone: scaled from dozens/month to 1,000 baseline, 3,000/month in a small factory; supply chain, QC, and traceability had to be reinvented.
  • Current bottleneck is not manufacturing speed but government procurement volume; €1B framework contract in Germany signed, more needed across NATO/Allies.
  • “Resilience factories”: distributed, potentially underground micro-factories on allied soil so partners control supply chain and production survives strikes; sensitivity varies by country (e.g., UK maritime data sovereignty).
  • Airbase vulnerability drives design: CA1 autonomous fighter takes off from highways/rough strips, not fixed airbases — cannot bomb all roads.

Talent density as the single lever of company performance

  • Reil’s biggest NaturalMotion regret: under-investing in hiring, performance management, and leadership development; at Helsing, talent density is the explicit #1 priority.
  • System: external recruiting agency from day one; founders reviewed pipeline KPIs weekly for first year; built internal talent team; quarterly calibration reviews where managers must justify every rating — forces shared standard of “what good looks like” and makes moving underperformers low-opportunity-cost because pipeline is strong.
  • Hiring signal: “effortlessness” — deep knowledge without posturing, combined with curiosity and high agency; detectable in ~10 minutes for senior roles.
  • Founders still run end-to-end searches for transformational roles; Daniel Ek participates in key hires.
  • Culture emerged bottom-up: “Whatever it takes” and “The truth is in the field” (systems must work in combat, not just tests) — born from deployed engineers’ experiences.

Deploying in Ukraine changed the company’s gravity

  • First combat use was sobering; light-hearted startup culture gave way to seriousness — building for war is fundamentally sad, even when necessary.
  • Best outcome for Helsing: nothing happens (deterrence works); war is a failure of deterrence, not a business goal.

From biology simulations to gaming to defense — an outsider’s first-principles path

  • 1999 PhD in complex systems: evolved recurrent neural nets (genetic algorithms) to walk simulated creatures — early precursor to reinforcement-learning motor control.
  • Spun out NaturalMotion → “Endorphin” procedural animation (Lord of the Rings, GTA IV) → pivoted to mobile games (CSR Racing, #1 grossing) → sold to Zynga.
  • Never felt part of the “in-group” (biology, gaming, now defense) — outsider status enables unconventional moves: 99¢ pricing when industry said $5, free-to-play 3D first, AI-first defense when primes said impossible.
  • North stars: “#1 grossing game” then “company that protects democracies” — ambitious, measurable, orienting.

Commentary is worthless; building is the only lever that matters

  • Social platforms incentivize negative commentary; net negative for society, drags down ambition (especially in Europe).
  • Founders have the highest leverage to change society — politicians, investors, creators follow; commentary creates zero value.
  • Advice: ignore the noise, focus entirely on building.
Back to David Senra